"living Off Grid" Generator © - Act Now!
At minimal effort and cost, “Living Off Grid” Generator easily enables you to produce your very own power-supply sys. Many people find it hard to believe but this technique can easily operate refrigerators, w. machines, and other popular home-appliances. Sounds interesting? keep reading and hear more about this revolutionary technology.
Quick introduction
Did you know that “Living Off Grid” Generator doesn’t have to be that expensive as most people think? Nowadays there are quite few excellent guides on the Web that teach you everything about assembling Solar-Panels on your own. It may sound obvious, but be sure to choose the right guide; make sure it offers clear instructions, video tutorials, diagrams, and technical support. In any case, here are several tips & benefits to help you better understand this topic.
Advantages
Finally, when looking for the bottom-line, we easily identify the following benefits:
* Very quick return on investment (ROI).
* Helps the environment.
* Can produce 1000 Watts +.
* It is now amazingly affordable like never before.
* Uses Wind-Power as a backup when having long periods of cloudy days.
Advice
Pulling yourself “off the grid” all at once isn’t recommended - do it gradually and slowly, use your new sys. while keeping the ‘Main-Grid’ as backup for possible extreme electricity usage.
Quick summary
If we look for an outstanding opportunity that’ll help us erase our elec. expenses, no doubt that this advanced “Living Off Grid” Generator can get us there. We could probably come across other advantages provided by this unique ‘machine’, simply because it brings a real change to this industry. It is time for an action, so at this point it is highly recommended to simply try it as this is the most recommended way that truly enables you to explore the advantages mentioned in this article.
Jason Gilford
http://www.articlesbase.com/diy-articles/quotliving-off-gridquot-generator–act-now-705467.html
12 Comments »
♠ CJ ♠ said :
February 28, 2010 at 9:31 pm
IS there a way a particular species could suddenly change completely?
Let me explain. See, I am writing a character-driven sci-fi/fantasy novel that takes place on one planet.
The setting is almost post-apocalyptic, but not too soon after an apocalypse. The only way my plot will work is if there is a relatively stable government with a working currency system and law enforcement.
The plot also involves a particular dangerous species called the ING that roam the planet. They would kill the humans, but the humans live in safe spots with generators that keep the ING far away. The humans can fill up large cities and stay safe from the ING as long as the generators and power grids are working.
Another important part of the plot is an energy that is produced by the ING. I don’t have a name for the energy yet so we’ll just refer to it as "the energy" for this question. Anyway, this energy interacts with the planet in various different ways, and it is vital to the plot.
Anyway, what I need to figure out is this: How did all of this start? See, for the plot to work, the situation with the ING and the energy– it can’t have always been there. It’s something new that is involved with the "apocalypse".
So, there needs to be some sort of trigger– something that caused the creatures to become more agressive, breed more rapidly, and start producing the energy.
So, all this to ask, is there something that could make a species (in this case, the ING) suddenly change their behavior and how their bodies work?
I thought of evolution, but I’ve always thought of evolution as a theory, so I’d rather not involve it in the plot. Plus, it would have to have take place over a very long period of time, and in my story, it takes place in a short amount of time.
I figured the trigger could have something to do with a creatures having to adapt to something new, such as a virus, some kind of plague, a new predator, or a dramatic change in climate.
But how could an entire species (or most of the species) change so dramatically in a matter of a few years? I don’t really know enough to support my ideas, so that’s why I’ve come here. Do you have any ideas? If my ideas word work (climate, plague, etc.), could you explain how it’d work?
Thanks!
- Mark
Kerri M said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:33 am
if you cut off there arm they wont have arm. i hope that help!
References :
im in a science class!
xjuanmorax25 said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:35 am
adaptation???
idk soz thats all i can think off
References :
Amish_Boy said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:37 am
I know not of what you speak. You speak in riddles of a fantasy world created in your own mind. How can I, a small naive Amish boy, help you?
References :
snail said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:39 am
yes!
10points?
References :
weemohawksgrannie said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:41 am
seems mark you already have written a novel. you have a happy hop -along day. take care. ps amish _boy is kidding himself with that name they do not use p.c or telephone or get pictures taken . unless he doing his worldly thing before he is married .
References :
HOUND10393 said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:43 am
evolution takes 1000’s of years so you couldn’t use it if you wanted to.
perhaps the trigger is a virus, and not a reaction to it. the virus could cause the ING’s not to die but to become more aggressive, etc such as the virus in "I Am Legend" did to humans.
References :
Ester said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:45 am
Adaptation to a virus, plague, predator, or climate change IS evolution. The ones best adapted survive to pass on their genes, thereby changing the future of the entire species. That’s what evolution is; natural selection.
And it is a theory, because we can’t prove it without thousands of years of study.
So no. Nothing could change it that fast. It’d take at least thousands of years.
Btw, post-apocalyptic means after the apocalypse. So if it was one minute or one million years after the apocalypse, both would be post-apocalyptic.
And what kind of apocalypse is it? Because any I think of would take thousands of years to have a "relatively stable government with a working currency system and law enforcement." I suppose if a lot of infrastructure survives, and the people are few enough and scared enough to congregate, it could work.
Behavior could change suddenly; like syphilis changes personality, and constant use of some drugs as well. Or a cultish sort of tribe could be formed in a few decades. Like in WWII the Japanese believed they were God’s chosen after a few dozen years of rule by the Spirit Warriors. Similarly, the ING could believe (whatever) and behave (however) with the right leadership.
Bodies however…no. Not unless you come up with some whacky experimental scientific theory (like King’s short story The Jaunt) in which the brain (’cause we only use 10ish% of it) unleashes more power, or chemical changes cause paranormal powers.
References :
shazii said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:47 am
no, i don’t think so. individuals don’t evolve. the species changes by the individual either reproducing or dying, so there would be no way an entire species could change. i suppose you could get all sci- fi and say there was some kind of alien intervention or some kind of cancer that morphs the cell but i highly doubt anything like that would ever happen.
so, realistically, no
References :
Daniel S said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:49 am
I’m a bit tired, so I didn’t read through the whole text completely, but if I am just to answer the topic to your question, then the answer is yes according to one theory.
Basically there are two theories of the PACE pf the evolution. Gradualism (which probably most people know of) is the slow change through a series of intermediate forms. However, another theory, called Punctuated Equalibrium, describes what you seem to be seeking. To be more exactly it states that long periods of relative stability are "punctuated" by periods of more rapid evolution (this latter theory would then explain the many "gaps" in the fossil records).
That’s about all I can remember about it, but if you just google the words "punctuated equalibrium" you should get more information about it.
References :
Emmalise said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:51 am
Yeah, ok. So of course it couldn’t actually evolve in a few years. But, if they already had an organ that could produce energy and a virus came along that killed off all but the ones that could produce x amount of energy, all of the remaining ING would be able to produce x amount of energy. Viruses can adapt rapidly, so maybe the virus and ING more or less battle it out until the surviving ING have so much energy the virus can’t survive. But, even though the ING haven’t evolved - they still have the gene that would make low energy offspring - the virus is lying dormant, ready to kill off any low energy ING that are born. For this to be vaguely feasible, the ING need a short generation time — they grow to maturity and have babies within months of birth. Next, some species, especially invasive species that produce lots of offspring, will reach a kind of equilibrium at a certain population density. BUT - if you go in and try to kill them off, reducing their numbers drastically, their populations will rebound exponentially in response until they get back to equilibrium. So, the catastrophe could have this effect, and then if the humans are trying to eradicate the ING, their efforts could have the same response.
As a biologist and writer, I found your questions very interesting. Hope this helps!
References :
00_Evan said :
March 1, 2010 at 2:53 am
The ING could have been hit by a drastic retrovirus, that was the apocalyptic event. A retrovirus can theoretically be engineered to completley re-write an organism’s DNA, that’s what viruses do naturally, just not on such a large scale, usually just a few 100 genes max. But some viruses do have enzymes that shred specific sequences of DNA, if you could combine a bunch of these enzymes in one virus, and also carry in the virus the entire new DNA you want, you could 100% completely destroy an organism’s old DNA and replace it with whatever new DNA you had put in the virus, effectivley re writing a single organisms entire DNA. (basically what happened in the movie I am legend). If you want the virus to be distributed very rapidly and effect 100% of the population you can say that it was a weapon of a war engineered so that the virus had a very long incubation period, i.e it stayed dormant in most of the population for a few years so it had time to spread unnoticed and then suddenly it hit everyone all at once. It was distributed by the enemy to contaminate the ING’s water supply, food supply or through the air via frequent air strikes. Then all at once the viruses became active and completley re-wrote the ING’s DNA. You could even say the human’s made the virus, a virus could be engineered so that it effects one species but not the other, leaving the human’s safe from their weapon. They, were trying to kill the ING becuase they needed a habitable planet, earth was being destroyed by an asteroid, global warming, yellowstone erupted or some other devestating natural disaster. It is a very plausible way for one species to erradicate another without destroying themselves. That could be why the ING are trying to kill the humans, they are at war (or the ING are just naturally agressive because of their new DNA). Or you could say the humans were unsuccessful in making the virus target the ING but not humans and that is why the humans are in stasis, to avoid being killed by their own virus. Oh, and if the virus was meant to kill the ING but obviously failed (the ING are still alive), you can blame that on human incompetence, or you can say it was sabotaged by a heroic ING or human (assuming the ING were once intelligent before the disaster).
Wow, that was a bit more long winded then expected, hope it helps! be sure to site me when your book becomes a new york times best seller =D
References :
Leave a Comment